public safety, civil rights groups battle over face id tech - security camera protection box

San Francisco is expected to be the first in the United StatesS.
The city's ban on the use of facial recognition by police and other urban institutions reflects an increasing backlash against a technology that is spreading to airports, motor vehicle departments, shops, stadiums and home security cameras
Government agencies across the United StatesS.
I have been using this technology for over a decade to scan the database, look for suspects and prevent identity fraud.
But recent advances in artificial intelligence have created more sophisticated computer vision tools that make it easier for the police to find missing children or protesters among the mobile crowd, or have the retailer analyze the shopper's facial expressions while reading the store shelves.
Efforts to limit its use are being resisted by law enforcement groups and the tech industry, although it is far from a united front.
While Microsoft opposes a complete ban on the technology, it urges lawmakers to impose restrictions on the technology and warns that if it is not controlled, it may remind people of George Orwell's novel 1984.
"Face recognition is one of the creepy technologies that people get," said Alvaro Bedoya, director of Georgetown University's Center for Privacy and Technology . ".
"This is not like cookies on a browser.
The technology does make people's hair on the back of their heads stand up.
"If there is no provision prohibiting law enforcement officers from accessing the driver's license database, people who have never been arrested may become part of the virtual police force --
Tech skeptics say ups is not aware of them.
They worry that people will one day not be able to go to parks, shops or schools without being identified and tracked.
There are already several large box stores in the United States. S.
Are trying out cameras with facial recognition that can guess their age, gender or mood as customers go out of date with the aim of showing them targeted authenticitytime ads on in-
Store video screens.
If San Francisco passes the ban, other cities, states and even Congress can follow suit. Lawmakers from both parties want to limit government surveillance, while others want to limit how businesses analyze these faces, the emotions and emotions of the unsuspecting public.
California's legislature is considering a proposal to ban the use of facial recognition technology on body cameras.
Bipartisan bill of the United StatesS.
The Senate will waive the police's application, but without consent, impose restrictions on businesses that analyze people's faces.
Similar legislation to San Francisco is pending in Oakland, California, and on Thursday a ban was imposed in Somerset, Massachusetts.
Bedoya said the ban on San Francisco as the "state-of-the-art city in our country" would warn other police departments considering trying out imperfect technology.
But Vice President Daniel Castro
Industry president-
The Information Technology and Innovation Foundation, which supports it, says the regulations are too extreme to serve as a model.
"It may be successful in San Francisco, but I would be surprised if it was successful in many other cities," he said . ".
San Francisco is home to technology innovators such as Uber, Airbnb and Twitter, but the city is not well connected with the industry.
Some executives at the Town Hall called for a tax on stocks
In response to the wave of listings for San Francisco companies including Lyft and Pinterest.
At the same time, San Francisco plays an important role in protecting immigration, civil liberties and privacy.
In November, nearly 60% of voters adopted a proposal to strengthen data privacy guidelines.
Proposal of the city
The prohibition of recognition is part of broader legislation aimed at regulating the use of supervision by the urban sector.
The legislation applies only to the San Francisco government and will not affect companies or people who want to use the technology.
This will also not affect the use of facial recognition at San Francisco International Airport, where security is primarily the responsibility of federal agencies.
The Board of Supervisors is scheduled to vote on the bill on Tuesday.
San Francisco police say they stopped their face recognition tests in 2017.
Spokesman David Stevenson said in a statement that the ministry is looking forward to "developing legislation that addresses the issue of technical privacy while balancing the public safety issues of our growing international cities.
The Supervisor Aaron Peskin admitted his legislation, known as the "Stop Secret Surveillance Ordinance", is not very high-techfriendly.
But he says public oversight is critical given the potential for abuse.
This technology often goes wrong.
Research shows the error rate on the face
Analysis systems built by Amazon, IBM, and Microsoft are much higher for the dark.
Lighter skin than a woman-skinned men.
Even if facial recognition is very accurate, its use poses a serious threat to civil rights, especially in a city with a rich history of protest and expression, said Matt Carger, lawyer for Northern California ACLU
"If facial recognition is added to a body camera or in public --
In the face of monitoring information, this will threaten people's ability to protest or hang out at Dolores Park without a city tracking identity, "he said, it refers to a popular park in the Mission District of San Francisco.
However, local critics of the San Francisco legislation fear it will prevent police from conducting investigations in a city where vehicles are heavily damaged --
Ins and a few high-
Introduction to the annual parade
They want to ensure that the police can continue to use video surveillance from merchants and residents in the investigation without bureaucratic trouble.
Deputy Joel Engardio
The president of the grassroots organization Stop Crime SF wants cities to be flexible.
"Our point is, why not suspend the use so that we don't use the technology that is in question, but open the door for the technology improvement? ” he said.
The ban is being considered in the Massachusetts legislature, which is backed by Republican and Democratic senators.
Often, the government's facial recognition work is carried out in secret or is not noticed.
In Massachusetts, the motor vehicle registration authority has been using the technology to prevent driver's license fraud since 2006, and some police agencies have also used it as a tool for detectives.
"We use technology . "
Tom Ryan added the fact that "we tend to be less involved in propaganda.
Ryan and the agency declined to answer further questions about how to use it.
Sen, Massachusetts
Democratic Party, sponsor of the suspension act Cynthia Kreem said she was concerned about the lack of standards to protect the public from inaccurate or biased facial recognition techniques.
She said the government should not use it until a better guideline exists.
California Highway Patrol does not use face recognition technology.
Marty Greenstein, a spokesman for the California motor vehicle department, said facial recognition technology "is not allowed in the photos of the DMV.
State Department of Justice spokeswoman Jennifer Molina said her agency does not use face ID technology, and the policy states that "the Department of Justice and applicants must not maintain DMV images for the creation of databases" unless authorized ".
Lawmakers are also seeking to suspend face recognition in Washington this year, home to Microsoft and Amazon, but the ban has been lifted amid opposition from industry and police.
On the contrary, Microsoft supports lighters
As part of a broader data privacy bill, touch the proposal, but the deliberations stalled before lawmakers adjourned late last month. ——
O'Brien reports in Providence, Rhode Island.