opposing arguments to the use of cctv security camera surveillance - cctv camera case
With the use of CCTV cameras in the United States and globally increasing, the debate on their numbers and motivations is also increasing.
There are a lot of arguments about video surveillance, including peace of mind, loss prevention, deterrence and crime resolution, but what about the other side of the story?
Thousands of individuals and groups oppose video surveillance and many of them have very effective views.
What are the consequences of allowing big brother to enter our entire public life?
Will this eventually lead to the invasion of our private trip? ons?
When did it start too much?
ACLU has a complete website where you are being watched and committed to "the high cost of the camera monitoring system, both in terms of money and civil liberties, "This is just an example of a group that is taking action.
So what are some of the main arguments against the use of CCTV surveillance systems? Lets see. . .
This is the most common argument against surveillance systems.
No one likes the idea of being watched, but we're starting to see security cameras on more street corners and light poles.
It makes sense that cities often say they are monitoring and preventing crime, but many people, whether innocent or not, would rather not have cameras there.
While video surveillance is more generally accepted in the public domain, the mood becomes more active with the use of hidden and hidden cameras in the private sector.
At present, the law imposes restrictions in this area, but the main concern is the future of citizens' privacy. Mistrust -
The use of security cameras at home or in business can make residents feel distrustful.
If your family or employees are constantly being watched, there is a good chance of hostility and hostility in the air.
It feels like your every move is monitored and recorded, which is not only creepy, but also very scary.
Even the most trusted employees become paranoid and nervous when the cameras point to their compartments all day long.
No longer dozing off, check out facebook, text messages or graffiti and you're being watched!
Not proven to be valid
Research in California and London found that security cameras had little effect on reducing crime.
With the increase in the number of cameras in many big cities, many have replaced human security, a strong argument that will be the main target of many opposing groups.
I think we all agree that there is nothing that can replace the thinking, action and problem-solving capabilities of human police or security guards, and if we start to rely on cameras as a pure deterrent, how do we plan to stop the crime when it happens?
Abuse and abuse
Footage taken by CCTV cameras can easily be abused and misused by those who can reach it.
For example, video can be used to discriminate against people and sneak peek.
In the age of the Internet, this is another huge deal that can be seen on all "funny" YouTube videos.
I wonder if these topics will be interesting.
This is clearly related to privacy violations and is one of the most concerned issues for activists.
Just need a "funny guy" security post a shot or still image of someone doing something embarrassing or they shouldn't do it, reputation is destroyed and privacy is broken, those who oppose CCTV will have more ammunition.
All these reasons are valid reasons against CCTV surveillance.
There are many cities and countries with huge monitoring systems, and in the near future, we may see a significant increase in public monitoring, so, the more the public knows about the industry and their rights and so on, the more ready everyone can be when it happens in the corner of your planet.
Do you have any other objections to the use of the security camera system?
What is your idea?
Will you fight with them or will you be willing to take an observation and open up your "public" life?
Feel free to leave comments on your ideas and opinions.