concern at number of firms using cctv to spy on staff - cctv camera housing price

by:Hanway     2019-09-09
concern at number of firms using cctv to spy on staff  -  cctv camera housing price
Big Brother is watching you.
Data Protection Commissioner Billy Hawkes is concerned about the increasing number of employers using CCTV to monitor workers.
Secret monitoring of employees-
With a few exceptions-
He said that criminals who use this Orwell strategy are illegal and that he will be prosecuted after 2011 annual reports were published yesterday.
"We are very interested in CCTV monitoring.
"It's very invasive," he told the Irish Independent . "
A pool worker was illegally monitored by his employer on CCTV cameras, one of the 1,161 complaints his office investigated last year.
While more than half of the complaints are about people not being able to access their personal data, the illegal use of CCTV cameras is increasingly worrying, he said.
Last year, 37 complaints were investigated using CCTV cameras.
"Even if the employer tries to legalize monitoring employees by referring to CCTV in their company manual, he said in the report:" Our position remains that, transparency and equivalence are key points for any data controller to consider before using CCTV. ".
He added that it was only in exceptional circumstances of "serious nature" that the employer had reason to use CCTV in secret to monitor individual workers.
On October 2010, in a complaint from a pool administrator hired by Westwood swimming Co. , Ltd. , which is now non-existent in Leopold, southern Dublin, the worker received who was not at the scene within three months, and "he allegedly described to him what he had done at a particular time ".
The worker then received two separate written warnings.
The commission found that the company violated the data protection law and the company agreed to revoke any disciplinary action against him.
At the same time, the Commission also found that some of Ireland's leading communications companies still did not receive information about sending intrusive text messages.
On last March, Eircom, Vodafone, 02 and UPC were sued and fined by the Dublin District Court for sending unsolicited marketing text messages or phone calls.
UPC acknowledged 18 allegations of sending unwanted text messages to four customers who had previously informed the company that they did not wish to receive a marketing call.
After "a lot of complaints", politicians were attacked for the same crimes. . .
"About the active engagement of political parties or candidates in 2009," Hawkes wrote ".
Despite writing to all parties before the 2011 election, Hawkes's office launched 25 investigations into such violations last year.
Custom message